Traveler Reviews Magnuson Hotel Extended Stay Canton Ohio
Number of reviews per page
20
20
40
40
Top reviews
Jose
Business and Leisure
10.0
/10
Reviewed 14 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Excellent stay. Very respectful staff. Comfortable for the whole stay
Otis
Business and Leisure with Friends
8.0
/10
Reviewed 20 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Need renovations and parking lot fixing
mike
2.0
/10
Reviewed 22 week(s) ago
Hotels.com verified review
Interesting stay in a hotel covered from low end apartments. Within an hour of arrival, a daylight shooting interrupted my plans. Police going door to door, asking questions. When I returned at 11pm, still a large police presence.
Wendy
Business and Leisure with Partner
2.0
/10
Reviewed 24 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
They had big Roaches crawling on the walls in the day light.
Michelle
10.0
/10
Reviewed 25 week(s) ago
Hotels.com verified review
The staff are great!
Michelle
Business
10.0
/10
Reviewed 27 week(s) ago
Hotels.com verified review
It's very quiet but you do have to pay a 50.00 deposit so be aware. But this place is worth it
Michelle
Business
10.0
/10
Reviewed 29 week(s) ago
Hotels.com verified review
It's one of the quiets
David
Business Family
6.0
/10
Reviewed 30 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Overall good
Michelle
Business
8.0
/10
Reviewed 31 week(s) ago
Hotels.com verified review
It's quite but they require a 50.00 deposit that isn't mentioned on hotels.com.
Drew
Business and Leisure
8.0
/10
Reviewed 38 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
I was impressed by the unheard traffic noise and the size for the price. The only negative I have is the maintenance issues and some missed items in the kitchen that should have been removed before the next guest.
Pamela
Business with Partner
8.0
/10
Reviewed 38 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
This was not an hotel it was an actual apartment l.
Ashley
Leisure with Partner
10.0
/10
Reviewed 39 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
It’s more like a apartment or townhouse than a hotel I loved the full kitchen and how the bedroom is separated from the living space
Joe
Leisure with Pet
10.0
/10
Reviewed 52 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Love to peace and quiet easy access they were most helpful
Bob
Leisure Family
2.0
/10
Reviewed 52 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
We were in room for about 5 minutes and left. It was so disgusting. I have seen worse but it was really bad. Not even going to try to get a refund, they can keep the money. Moved down the road to a better accommodation.
Andrew
Leisure Family
8.0
/10
Reviewed 53 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
its a good place for the price and convenance of cooking your own meals. its not the Rittz Carlton but its definitely a good place for the price.
Leroy
Leisure
2.0
/10
Reviewed 64 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Roaches in the bed
Robert
6.0
/10
Reviewed 65 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Partying going on all night outside the rooms. In the whole parking lot. People racing motorcycles around the parking lot. People barely leaving you enough room to park your vehicle. Opening their truck doors into my truck. It was like a Big Hotel parking lot party going on every day. No TV in the bedroom only in the livingroom. Couch had stains on it. Baby food left in the cupboards. No lights in the fridge. Light bulbs missing in almost every room. Definitely could use some remodeling !!! I could go on and on. One of the worst places I've ever stayed in. Thing was everywhere was booked, so I couldn't move anywhere else.
Read More
Angela
10.0
/10
Reviewed 68 week(s) ago
Hotels.com verified review
The service was really good. No problems at all . The room was great it was like a little 1 bedroom apartment.
Xinfang
10.0
/10
Reviewed 76 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Nice
mark
Business Family
4.0
/10
Reviewed 80 week(s) ago
Expedia Group verified review
Reserved and paid for a king room. When I get there I’m told they only have a double bed. Not even queen. Not what I paid for or needed. I would not go back