VICTOR EDUARDO
2,0
/10
Đánh giá cách đây 14 tuần
Hotels.com verified review
I have written hotel reviews for many years and have always tried to be fair. Good hotels deserve praise; poor experiences deserve honesty. This is one of the very few occasions on which I have felt genuinely let down.
The facilities advertised are exactly what they are: no air conditioning, no lift, no gym, no laundry service, and no in-room safe. That is not my complaint. We booked the hotel knowing those limitations.
The problem was the room itself. We were allocated Room 3, directly above a very busy pub. During an unusually warm spell, keeping the windows closed was simply not an option. Keeping them open, however, meant enduring late-night noise and cigarette smoke drifting into the room from smokers gathered immediately below our window.
After deciding that the room was simply unsuitable, we checked out and moved elsewhere. The hotel was fully booked, so our rooms were promptly reoccupied. Nevertheless, two weeks' accommodation for two rooms—approximately £5,000—was retained under the non-refundable policy.
The hotel was perfectly entitled to rely on its terms and conditions. Equally, guests are entitled to judge whether exercising every contractual right is always the same as treating customers fairly. Contracts define what business may do. Character is revealed by what they choose to do.
As the English saying goes, just because you can, doesn't always mean you should.
The hotel kept the money; we kept the lesson. Future travellers may wish to keep both.
Đọc thêm



